MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787611 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-419

Interactive Design and Application of Virtual Training System for Smart Substation Combining Configuration Algorithm and Digital Twin Technology

2025· article· en· W4409787611 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTraining (meteorology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power system simulation training is one of the important means to improve the quality of operators and ensure the safe and effective operation of power systems.Research based on digital twin technology, combined with configuration algorithms to give the substation integration diagram model generation method, developed a smart substation virtual training system.The intelligent monitoring is studied, the digital twin-based substation output voltage anomaly detection method is designed using the tracking differentiator method, and finally the simulation test of the intelligent substation virtual training system is carried out.The analysis shows that the voltage anomaly detection method in this paper is highly accurate and can extract the voltage anomaly waveform, and the offset rate of its collected signal is significantly lower than that of the comparison method (11.58%~14.84%),which is only 0.54%.The training test of fast distance protection, differential protection and zero sequence protection verifies the feasibility and effectiveness of the virtual training system in practical application.The platform can effectively promote the reform of applied electric power practice courses and provide a backbone for the training of new power system talents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicAdvanced Decision-Making TechniquesFrench-language works237,207