Analyzing the Impact of Financial Sharing Models on the Efficiency of Resource-Consuming Firms in a Low-Carbon Economy Using Monte Carlo Methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to the greening and decarbonization of economic development and in search of a path to improve the corporate efficiency of resource-consuming enterprises, the study explores the impact of the financial sharing model on the efficiency of resource-consuming enterprises.The research hypothesis is formulated after the preliminary analysis of related theories such as financial sharing and accounting information.After completing the selection of research samples and data collection, the research variables are defined, the regression analysis model of the impact of financial sharing model on enterprise efficiency is constructed, and empirical analysis is conducted.The research hypotheses proposed in the previous section are verified through regression analysis.Monte Carlo method is used to simulate the financial sharing model and resource-consuming enterprise efficiency, and the net present value of resource-consuming enterprises is simulated during the construction period and the operation period of the financial sharing model, respectively, so as to understand their enterprise efficiency.The results of the empirical study show that financial sharing can realize the improvement of enterprise efficiency.Enterprise efficiency can increase with the improvement of accounting information transparency and accounting information consistency.During the construction and operation periods of the financial sharing model, the mean enterprise NPV after five years of operation is $608.4 and $2,327.4million, respectively, and the probability of positive NPV is 68% and 94%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".