MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787622 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-382

Study on the Construction of Multilevel Regression Model for the Integration of Sichuan Rural Music and Cultural Tourism Industry under the Rural Revitalization Strategy

2025· article· en· W4409787622 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismRural tourismRegression analysisMultilevel modelGeographyEconomic geographyBusinessRegional scienceTourism geographyStatisticsArchaeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration and development of Sichuan's rural music and cultural tourism industry is of great signi icance in the context of rural revitalization strategy.The purpose of this paper is to construct a multilevel regression model to deeply explore the in luencing factors and role mechanisms of the integration of the two.Through theoretical analysis and empirical research, the research variables are clari ied, and the null model, random effect model and complete model are constructed and data validation and analysis are carried out.The results show that the richness of rural music resources, the level of cultural and tourism industry, policy guidance and support, market demand and human resources have a signi icant positive impact on the integration of rural music and cultural and tourism industry in Sichuan.The results of the full multilevel regression model show that the same level of rural music resource abundance has different impacts on the integration of rural music and cultural and tourism industries due to regional differences.The results of the study provide theoretical support for the development of cultural tourism industry in Sichuan Province, and deeply help the implementation of rural revitalization strategy in Sichuan Province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicRegional Development and EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207