Optimization study of urban elderly manpower resource development strategy based on differential evolutionary algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of urban elderly human resource development, differential evolutionary algorithms can be used to optimize the development strategy and improve the efficiency of resource utilization.The study constructs a multi-objective scheduling optimization model for human resources based on an improved differential evolutionary algorithm, which searches for the optimal development strategy by simulating the mutation, crossover, and selection operations in the process of biological evolution.In addition, the model combines a multi-objective feature selection algorithm to capture the data information of urban elderly resource development more accurately and ensure the scientific and practicality of the strategy.The pareto front of this paper's algorithm on the optimal solution test function is more in line with the real frontier, and the GD value is between 0.00171 and 0.0325, which has better convergence.The execution time of this algorithm for elderly manpower resource scheduling is shortened compared to the comparison algorithm, and the convergence of different task sizes is accomplished when iterating to 110~150 rounds.The ADE-MOFS algorithm has the lowest running cost and the shortest completion period on elderly manpower resource scheduling.The research in this paper shows new ideas and methods for the rational development and utilization of urban elderly manpower resources, which has important theoretical and temporal significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it