Research on Energy Efficiency Regulation Strategy of Distributed Sensor Networks Based on Graph Optimization Algorithm in Intelligent Buildings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks, which integrate a variety of technologies such as sensors, microelectromechanical systems, wireless communications, and distributed information processing, have become a cutting-edge field for studying the behavior of intelligent autonomous self-governing systems in groups.This paper explores distributed sensor networks in intelligent buildings, uses QoS routing algorithm based on ant colony optimization to implement the strategy of energy efficiency regulation of distributed sensor networks, and conducts experimental analysis on the performance of the algorithm as well as distributed sensor networks.Compared with the PCCAA algorithm, the node degree variance and channel percentage variance of this paper's algorithm are smaller, the network link distribution and channel allocation are more balanced, and the topology is better.Meanwhile, the average power of this paper's algorithm is slightly larger than that of the PCCAA algorithm, which is able to increase the robustness of the network while reducing the energy consumption and BER to ensure the network performance.In addition, the variance of the node energy consumption of this paper's algorithm in different networks is smaller than that of the PCCAA algorithm, which indicates that this paper's algorithm can make the node energy consumption of the whole network more balanced, and then improve the energy efficiency of the whole network.Simulation experiments prove that the algorithm in this paper effectively allocates node bandwidth through the quantization mechanism, thus reducing the amount of inter-node communication, while the corresponding sampling interval extension strategy can save the overall energy consumption of the network.The algorithm proposed in this paper has important practical value for energy efficiency regulation of sensor networks in intelligent buildings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".