MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787672 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-300

Artificial Intelligence-driven Speech Signal Extraction and Generation Based on Wave RNN Models

2025· article· en· W4409787672 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRecurrent neural networkSpeech recognitionSIGNAL (programming language)Artificial intelligenceExtraction (chemistry)Natural language processingArtificial neural networkChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of artificial intelligence, the technology of speech conversion has developed rapidly and has gradually become a hot topic of research in the field of speech processing.This paper explores the problem of speech signal extraction and generation based on Wave RNN model, and constructs a speech conversion generation model driven by artificial intelligence.First, the short-time Fourier transform is utilized to convert and preprocess the speech signal in the time-frequency domain.Second, a stepwise speech enhancement model is proposed to enhance the perceived strength of the speech signal.Then, a speech generation model based on improved self-attention mechanism and RNN is designed to realize the generation of speech signals.Finally, the model effect is evaluated for application.The time-frequency domain feature that mixes time-domain features and frequencydomain features is able to capture the characteristics of speech signals more comprehensively than a single time-domain feature and frequency-domain feature, which corresponds to a higher recognition accuracy and a lower training loss value.Meanwhile, after speech enhancement, the average accuracy of model A~D speech recognition is improved by 19%~25%, which indicates that the stepped speech enhancement model used in this paper can substantially enhance the perceptual strength of speech signals.In addition, the language conversion model in this paper outperforms other speech conversion models in both MCD and RMSE, and its advantage in rhyme mapping is obvious, and the pitch of the output speech is more accurate and natural.The model in this paper has high practical value in speech signal generation and conversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207