MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787689 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-323

Theoretical study on the design of improved dynamic characteristics of wind-resistant performance of large-span steel structures based on topology optimization

2025· article· en· W4409787689 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology optimizationSpan (engineering)Structural engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringComputer scienceFinite element methodElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-span steel structures are prone to wind vibration under wind loads, which affects the safety and performance of the structure, and wind vibration control is the key to its design.This paper takes the large-span steel structure as the research object, firstly introduces the theory and method related to wind vibration control analysis, constructs the topology-optimized inertial capacitance dampercontrolled wind vibration response dynamic equation of super high-rise building to analyze the influence law of wind speed and wind direction on the dynamic characteristics of the structure, and then further strengthens the vibration control ability of the structure through reasonable arrangement and parameter adjustment.The deformation of ETABS model in y-direction is larger than that in xdirection under 50-year wind load, and the maximum displacements in y-and x-directions are 18.72 mm and 11.65 mm, respectively.The y-direction interstory displacement angle meets the code requirement limit (2.6510-4).The amplitude of the acceleration time-range curve of its top floor structure is between 0.08, which meets the requirements for comfort.The optimization of the reinforcement layer using continuum topology optimization is better than the optimization of the optimal location arrangement according to finite element software.The results of node displacements and inter-story displacement angles of each story of the modified structural model under wind load meet the limits of top story displacement and inter-story displacement angle, and the performances are similar to those of the extended-arm truss structural model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207