Agricultural carbon financial innovation and carbon emission reduction effect: an empirical study based on system GMM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the green economy has been developing rapidly, and the environmentalization of industries has been widely popularized in various industries.This paper carries out an in-depth study on the relationship between agricultural carbon finance and carbon emission reduction, and after understanding the theory related to carbon finance and carbon emission, it adopts the method of system GMM estimation to construct a dynamic panel model for the study of agricultural carbon finance and carbon emission, and selects research variables.The development of agricultural carbon financial innovation and carbon emission in 30 provincial-level administrative regions in China from 2014 to 2024 is studied, and regression analysis is carried out using system GMM so as to obtain the relationship between the impact of agricultural carbon financial innovation on carbon emission reduction, and the robustness test is carried out.The maximum values of agricultural carbon financial scale, carbon financial efficiency, carbon financial structure, and per capita carbon emission are 16.942, 7.052, 1.926, and 128.945 respectively, while the minimum values are 0.965, 0.048, 0.079, and 0.145 respectively, and the maximum values are 17.56, 146.92, 100.33, and 889.28 times of the minimum values.There are large differences in the development of agricultural carbon financial innovation and carbon emission reduction effects among different provinces.Per capita carbon emissions are reduced by 22.5%, 20.5% and 24.5% for each unit increase in carbon financial scale, carbon financial efficiency and carbon financial structure, respectively.The parameter estimates of carbon financial scale, carbon financial efficiency, and carbon financial structure are significant at the levels of 10%, 1%, and 5%, respectively.It indicates that the innovative development of agricultural carbon finance can effectively promote carbon emission reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".