MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787709 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-526

Corporate Tax Burden Minimization Strategies under Tax Incentive Policies – Based on Mathematical Planning and Simulation Analysis

2025· article· en· W4409787709 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Taxation and Avoidance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Education of Guangdong ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsTax planningIncentivePublic economicsEconomicsTax basisTax incentiveCorporate taxTax creditTax reformMinificationMicroeconomicsBusinessInternational taxationComputer scienceTax avoidanceMathematical optimizationState income taxMathematicsGross income

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation of tax incentives is a powerful measure to reduce the burden of enterprises, build a new development pattern, and expand reform and opening-up.Some enterprises in nine provinces from 2010 to 2023 are sampled to verify the role of tax incentives in reducing the tax burden by using the double difference model.The weight coefficients are introduced as learning factors for the population center of mass, and the SWC-PSO algorithm is proposed to improve the shortcomings of PSO, which has low convergence accuracy and is prone to fall into local extremes, and to realize the mathematical planning for minimizing the tax burden of enterprises.After controlling the variables of tax policy and enterprise nature, the regression coefficient reflecting the enterprise tax burden is significantly negative at 1% level, and the tax burden of enterprises receiving tax incentives is significantly reduced, which proves the role of tax incentives in reducing the enterprise tax burden.After using SWC-PSO for planning, the sample units have a total of 1,779,919,000 yuan of tax relief, and the business tax rate of a construction project decreases from 3.35% to 0.42%, which indicates that the improved algorithm in this paper can plan the strategy of minimizing the tax burden of enterprises more efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicCorporate Taxation and AvoidanceFrench-language works237,207