MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787710 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-492

Quantitative assessment of the training effect of taijiquan on adolescents’ physical coordination based on particle swarm optimization algorithm

2025· article· en· W4409787710 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationTraining (meteorology)AlgorithmSwarm behaviourComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taijiquan is a kind of sport that can be used as a national itness program, and its effect on the training effect of adolescent physical coordination has important research value.In this paper, particle swarm optimization algorithm is applied to the optimization of taijiquan training program, and independent samples test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) are used to investigate the quantitative impact of taijiquan training on adolescents' physical coordination.The results show that the particle swarm optimization algorithm can effectively improve the effect of taijiquan training, and the algorithm convergence and other properties have obvious superiority compared with other algorithms.At the same time, after the experiment, all the physical coordination test indexes of the experimental group were signi icantly improved compared with the pre-test and the control group, which explains the important role of taijiquan training in the physical coordination training of adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207