MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787720 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-527

Design of a neural network-based automated style migration technique in digital media art

2025· article· en· W4409787720 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyle (visual arts)Artificial neural networkDigital mediaComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtWorld Wide WebVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The continuous development of neural network makes the automated style migration technology also rise to a new height.This paper selects digital media art as the research field, constructs Cycle GAN, a cyclic consistent generative adversarial network structure applied to digital media art, on the basic framework of GAN, and optimizes it by adding bilinear interpolation and attention mechanism, so as to build up a style migration model for digital media art.In the style migration simulation experiment, the IS test values of this paper's model on the photo2vangogh and photo2monet datasets are 5.32 and 6.03, and the FID test values are 97.52 and 75.55, which are better than the other comparative models.Similarly, the optimized performance of FID, SSIM and PSNR values on the dataset is also better than other comparative models, and the style migration performance of the model is verified.Using the model of this paper to design a digital topography with Chinese traditional ink painting as the content, we explore the correlation between the design attributes of the style migration design works in digital media art and the audience's cognitive evaluation and overall perception.Among the design attributes, "plot relevance" (4.375) and "atmosphere rendering" (3.38) have the highest T-value, which is the most important influence on audience perception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207