Research on the Innovation of Rattan Weaving Art Design Form and Inheritance of Cultural Symbols of Maonan Flower Bamboo Hat Based on Complex Geometry and AI Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The field of artificial intelligence provides a new practical path for the inheritance and protection of non-heritage art.This paper proposes an innovative morphological design method for rattan weaving art based on fractal theory, and the grasshopper plug-in is selected to establish a parametric design model.The fractal graphics generated by the iterative function system are used as the input graphics, and the GrabCut algorithm and VGG16 neural network are combined to propose a graphic rendering method based on style migration containing elements of the cultural symbols of the Maonan Flower Bamboo Hat, and to realize the inheritance of the cultural symbols of the Maonan Flower Bamboo Hat.In the high preference survey, the A1 and A4 features of the sun hat in the questionnaire results are consistent with the preference results derived from the fractal design, and the questionnaire results of the handbag and handkerchief are also consistent with the preference results derived from the fractal design.It shows that the product form design method of Maonan flower bamboo hat cultural symbols based on fractal theory and style migration can play a certain role in promoting cultural inheritance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".