Deep Learning-based Visitor Behavior Analysis and Prediction for Rural Tourism Intelligent Platforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the continuous development of deep learning technology and the increasing maturity of rural tourism market, this paper obtains tourism user-generated content data through customized crawler technology, describes the data flow diagram of single-user crawling and the data flow diagram of database batch crawling module.A sentiment index covering multiple dimensions is constructed to mine the deep-seated features of tourist behavior.Fusing effective features in tourism data by using multiple topological maps, using graph convolution network to capture multiple spatial features of scenic spots and recurrent neural network to capture temporal features of traffic, to complete the analysis and prediction of tourists' behavior.Taking Jiangxi Wuyuan Huangling rural attraction market as an example for empirical analysis, the importance of historical flow and search volume under all time windows is as high as 111 and 117 respectively, proving that these two features have a significant impact on predicting the target variables.The model in this paper is highly fitted to the predicted value of actual passenger flow at 12 time points, especially in the 9th month, the predicted value is 402, which is 401 from the actual value, which is an important reference value for rural tourism management and marketing strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".