MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787753 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-489

Studying the Interactive Efficiency of Social Media in English Language Education Based on Time Series Prediction Algorithms

2025· article· en· W4409787753 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Computer scienceSocial mediaTime seriesArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmNatural language processingMachine learningWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social media as a new type of media has become an important channel for people to obtain information and communicate, which brings new opportunities and challenges for English education.In this study, the Markov chain model is improved by using the weighted ward system clustering method and the fuzzy set theory to improve the prediction performance of the model.Then the ARIMA model and the improved Markov chain model are combined to construct an improved time series prediction model to realize the prediction of the interaction efficiency of social media in English education.The performance of the improved prediction model is superior compared to other comparative models, providing reliability for the subsequent prediction results.The prediction results show that the interactive efficiency of social media interaction data in English education shows an upward trend over time, and the number of readings and playbacks of English courseware resources as well as video resources increases from 18477 and 18147 to 88629 and 84571 in six months.The predicted results of this study indicate that social media has good interactive efficiency in English education, which can be utilized in the future to expand the dimension of education, build an English education platform, expand the teaching space and extend educational thinking, and play a percolating role in English education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicEducational Technology and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207