A Study on Improving Organizational Structure and Cultural Alignment Based on Iterative Computing in Enterprise Digital Transformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of big data, with the accelerated development of digital technology, enterprises are facing the pressure of digital transformation, and at the same time, big data computing system provides technical support for the digital transformation of enterprises.In this paper, we propose a data analysis system based on iterative computing for the digital transformation of enterprises.In order to avoid the resource consumption caused by unnecessary repeated calculations in iterative computing, this paper proposes optimization based on Spark fault-tolerant mechanism and constructs an enterprise data analysis system based on iterative computing model, which provides technical support for enterprise digital transformation.On this basis, this paper also provides optimization strategies in terms of organizational structure and cultural coordination for enterprise transformation, which provides an effective path for realizing comprehensive digital transformation of enterprises.Through the test of this paper's iterative computing data analysis system, the speed of Spark optimization based on this paper is increased by nearly 2 times, which illustrates the usefulness of this paper's optimization based on Sparl fault-tolerant mechanism.Meanwhile, the cache misses of the data analytics system are in the range of 46% to 60%, which provides better performance performance in terms of cache hits and time overhead.In this paper, we provide practical and feasible transformation paths for enterprise digital transformation from three aspects, including digital technology, enterprise organizational structure and culture, and promote the development of enterprise digital transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".