Goal-oriented performance evaluation: an analysis based on the Malmquist-KDE indicator model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Goal-oriented dimension is a new angle to solve the problem of universities' performance assessment.Firstly, designs an input-output index system, and calculates the Malmquist Index of the performance utilizes the panel data.Then, the non-parametric KDE graph is used in this research for further discussion of the differences of TFP changes.Meanwhile, a non-parametric KDE analysis is carried out respectively for TECHCH, EFFCH, PTEC, and SECH indexes.The Malmquist-KDE index model shows the results as follows: TFP is on a declining curve; the increased range of EFFECH is relatively smaller, while the annual growth of PECH and SECH are slow; the decrease of TFP is caused by the decrease of TECHCH; the general distribution gradually moves leftward, reflecting a fact that the TFP changes are decreasing progressively; the TFP change rate demonstrates obvious a skewed distribution; the patterns in the graph gradually shift from thin and tall ones into short and thick ones.Conversely, the changes of external factors force universities to improve their operations actively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".