MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787823 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-517

Commercial password modification for face recognition systems using quantum key distribution networks

2025· article· en· W4409787823 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPasswordKey (lock)Computer scienceS/KEYFacial recognition systemFace (sociological concept)Quantum key distributionQuantumComputer securityPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligencePhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information security is the most concerned issue in modern communication, with the continuous development of new computing technologies, classical cryptography has been difficult to effectively guarantee information security, quantum key distribution technology through the theory of quantum mechanics to ensure the absolute security of key distribution.Therefore face recognition system oriented optimization using quantum key distribution, this paper is based on the advantages of OQKD technology such as easy to implement, low overhead, high security, optimization for commercial privacy queries in the system.On the basis of the quantum key distribution regional network of trust relay, a new type of quantum key distribution experimental network structure based on switching nodes which is more flexible, energy-saving and efficient is proposed.Finally, the method of this paper is comprehensively verified through modeling simulation, and the simulation results show that the average call loss is 3.67% when the quantum key generation rate is increased to 20Kbps, which is significantly reduced.Moreover, the network call loss can be reduced to less than 11% when the method of this paper is adopted in the same situation, and the network call loss is even smaller.It shows that the call loss of the network will be greatly reduced when the key generation rate is increased with a fixed amount of voice traffic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207