Computer model-based analysis of user behaviour and emotional disposition on social platforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to be able to accurately identify user behavior and emotional tendency, this paper firstly adopts the neural network structure to build the emotion analysis model, and divides the model into four parts to analyze the text and emotion in social media, and obtains the information of semantics and emotion-related content in social media text.Secondly, from the semantic and emotional symbol content of the text in social media, the public emotional tendency model is built, and the sharing content and behavior of a large number of users in social media are analyzed.Finally, the association rule mining algorithm is used to extract the text and emotional symbols in social media, to improve the accuracy of the user's emotional tendency analysis model, and to be able to accurately derive the user's behavioral habits.In order to verify the analytical effect of the model, the model was tested, and the training speed of the BLSTM model was fast, and the training time was 1.5 hours in the first iteration of the test with a data set of 1 million.The model is more accurate in analyzing the user's positive emotions, with accuracy and precision around 85% and 90% respectively, and the results obtained are more accurate, meet the user's needs, and enhance the user's experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".