MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409791031 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-436

Study on distributed source-load aggregation strategy and capacity optimization considering power supply security constraints in distribution networks

2025· article· en· W4409791031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid and Power Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEconomic Research Institute
KeywordsDistribution (mathematics)Power (physics)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of distribution networks in China and the increasing penetration of renewable and traditional energy sources, it is necessary to study the optimal allocation of capacity and optimal operation for the two stages of pre-planning and practical application of distribution networks.In this paper, the probability density function is used to model the uncertainty of "source" and "load" respectively, and the optimal allocation model of distributed power supply capacity of distribution network system is constructed by the equipment models of "wind generator", "photovoltaic generator", "diesel generator" and "battery".Comprehensive cost and power supply security are taken as the objective function and constraints, respectively, to improve the distributed power supply capacity optimization, and adaptive sparrow search algorithm is applied to solve the model.In the comparative analysis of source-load synergy, source-load synergy and energy storage system joint optimization configuration scheme, the joint planning of DPV and ESS enhances the installed capacity of DPV by about 13.45%, and the average power generation of the joint planning scheme is 88.35 kW/h.The joint planning obviously enhances the installed capacity of DPV under the condition of slightly increasing the DPV curtailment.Examples are examined to verify the practical application of the proposed adaptive sparrow search algorithm in configuring the power supply capacity of the hybrid generation system, and the cost of using the cyclic charging operation scheme is 81,067 yuan lower than that of using the load-tracking scheme, and the economic effect has been significantly improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it