MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409791036 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-437

Research on multi-objective dynamic planning path modeling for college students’ career choice in employment and entrepreneurship

2025· article· en· W4409791036 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipCareer pathCareer planningPath (computing)SociologyPsychologyManagementMathematics educationPedagogyBusinessComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The employment and entrepreneurship career choice planning of college students is an important constituent module of the talent training system of colleges and universities in the new era.Aiming at the traditional ant colony algorithm with poor realm adaptability and a large number of inflection points, this paper proposes an ant colony algorithm based on Sigmoid statistical iteration.The Sigmoid activation function distribution strategy is adopted to reduce the blindness of the algorithm's presearch, and the heuristic function is dynamically adjusted by the introduction of the adaptive factor to reduce the convergence time of the algorithm, and finally the pheromone update function is dynamically adjusted according to the number of iterations to construct the career choice path planning model and apply the model to the career choice planning path recommendation system.When the number of users is 1000, the average response time of the proposed system is only 322ms, the throughput is 394, and the pass rate is 100%, and the CPU occupancy and memory usage are lower than those of the traditional system (35.32% and 39.83%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicEducational Reforms and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207