A Study of the Real-Time Impact of Economic Policies on Financial Market Liquidity Based on Time Series Analysis Methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the financial crisis, the economies of all countries have been affected by the recession triggered by global events, and the uncertainty brought by the changes in economic policies has also become a risky shock, and the uncertainty of economic policies has been climbing worldwide.This paper firstly briefly analyzes the mechanism of economic policy and financial market, in order to comprehensively study the changes of market economic liquidity, this paper starts from the return of the market economy, and adopts the symbolic time series analysis method to analyze the prediction of the financial market by taking the stock market as an example.Then construct the regression model, and then study the impact of economic policy uncertainty on market liquidity.The regression coefficient of economic policy uncertainty is 0.064, which is significant at 1% level.Secondly, when GDP growth rate and inflation level are added as control variables, the regression coefficient of economic policy uncertainty obtained is 0.108, which is still significant at 1% level, implying that a rise in economic policy uncertainty brings about a decline in market liquidity.This study provides an effective analytical tool for the impact of economic policies on market liquidity.It also provides a basis for the government to improve market liquidity and enhance market vitality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".