Empirical Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education and Cultural Confidence of College Students Based on Fuzzy Logic and Decision Tree Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the background of globalization and knowledge economy, the importance of innovation and entrepreneurship education for college students is becoming more and more prominent.This paper combines fuzzy logic and decision tree algorithm to construct a cultural confidence recognition model of innovation and entrepreneurship education.Feature selection and classification are carried out on the salient features of the collected data information on innovation and entrepreneurship education.First, eight types of statistical features, such as the degree of integration of excellent traditional culture, the degree of value leadership and moral cultivation, the innovative power of grounded cultural knowledge, and the effect of social responsibility cultivation, are extracted as inputs to the C4.5 algorithm, and a decision tree is constructed for feature selection.Then, according to the constructed decision tree, the affiliation function and IF-THEN rule of the fuzzy inference model are designed.Finally, the designed fuzzy inference model is used to classify the degree of cultural confidence.The method achieves 100% accuracy in recognizing the lack of cultural self-confidence in innovation and entrepreneurship education, and more than 90% in recognizing the overall effect of general cultural self-confidence and rich cultural self-confidence.The experimental results show that the combination of decision tree and fuzzy inference modeling is feasible for the detection and classification of college students' innovation and entrepreneurship education, and has strong practical application value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".