A Bayesian network-based analysis of the potential impact of emotion management skills on task completion efficiency improvement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For enterprises, development is ultimately reflected in the task completion performance of employees, and in order for employees to create higher task performance, it is necessary to consider not only their education and knowledge level, but also their emotional management ability.This study first collects data related to employees' emotion management ability and task completion efficiency improvement through questionnaires, and then analyzes the statistical data by using the potential impact identification model designed based on Bayesian neural network model to obtain the potential impact probability of each dimension of emotion management ability on task completion efficiency improvement.The analysis of the forward and reverse inference probabilities of the Bayesian network model indicated that the most important potential influence factor leading to the improvement of task completion efficiency was the emotion expression ability, with a forward and reverse inference probability of 36.2% and 59.4%, respectively, followed by the emotion regulation ability and emotion acceptance ability.The results of this study reveal the important potential influence of emotion management ability on task completion efficiency enhancement, and the formulation of task completion efficiency enhancement strategies based on the perspective of emotion management ability can effectively enhance employee task performance, which in turn promotes the overall development and competitive advantage of enterprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".