Calculation of the Number of Electric Vehicles Carried by Roll-on Roll-off Vessels Based on Fire Dynamics Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of the global cruise transportation industry and the worldwide increase of cruise ship transportation year by year, fire accidents on passenger and roll-on/roll-off ships (P/ROCs) pose a serious threat to economic properties.The article establishes a fire model of a passenger-roller ship carrying electric vehicles using the basic equation of dynamics, a large eddy simulation model, and a mixed fraction combustion model.The mesh division is used to improve the solving accuracy of the kinetic equations.The fire simulation conditions of the electric vehicle carried by a passenger-roller ship are designed to analyze the fire combustion characteristics of the passenger-roller ship transported in terms of wind speed, fire intensity, and ignition power in multiple dimensions using the FDS simulation software as a carrier.Based on the YOLOv5s network and combined with the improved non-great suppression algorithm, a statistical model for target detection of electric vehicles carried by a passenger-roller ship is designed, and the corresponding loss function is designed.When the external ambient wind speed was increased from 0.5 m/s to 6.5 m/s, the maximum temperature at the fire center of the electric vehicle carried by the passenger-roller ship was reduced from 883.93°C to 748.57°C.The improved YOLOv5s model has the highest mAP of 96.67% on the target detection of EVs after fire damage and an accuracy of 92.96% for counting the number of EVs after fire.The state of electric vehicles after fire damage can be obtained under fire dynamics simulation, and the target detection and quantity counting of electric vehicles can be effectively realized by combining deep learning technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".