Research on the teaching model of dynamic structural behavior simulation in structural engineering teaching by combining finite element method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to improve the teaching effect of dynamic structural behavior simulation in structural engineering teaching, this study develops a dynamic structural behavior simulation teaching model combined with the finite element method to explore the effect of its application in teaching.This paper first introduces the process of applying the finite element method to simulation teaching and the steps of structural engineering system development.After that, it introduces the common structural engineering analysis functions under ANSYS software and its application in various aspects of structural engineering teaching.Then the construction process of the dynamic structural behavior simulation teaching model is briefly described, and the finite element principle is combined with the actual engineering problems through the integration of case teaching to realize the deep integration of theory and practice.Finally, the teaching model of dynamic structural behavior simulation is constructed and the teaching evaluation system after applying the model.The results of teaching practice show that more than 95% of the students maintain a positive attitude towards the use of the model in this paper.Under the teaching mode of the simulation model visualizing dynamic behavioral characteristics, the average grade of students in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group by 14.96 points, and the difference between the grades of students in the two classes was significant (P=0.000).It can be seen that the use of the model can improve the students' understanding of dynamic structural mechanical behavior and the application of finite element analysis tools, which provides an efficient platform for combining theory and practice for structural engineering teaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".