Optimization research on the integration development path of agricultural, cultural and tourism industries in Yijun County based on data analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper firstly constructs a coupled evaluation index system based on three primary indicators, seven secondary indicators and 29 tertiary indicators for agriculture, culture and tourism.Then the entropy weight-TOPSIS method and the coupling coordination degree model are selected to measure the development of agriculture, culture and tourism industry and the coupling level in Yijun County respectively.Finally, 23 spatially related villages in Yijun county area are selected to reveal the reasons for their spatial differences with spatial measurement model, and analyze the factors affecting the coupled and coordinated development of agricultural, cultural and tourism industries in Yijun county area.From the comprehensive evaluation results, the trend of the development level of agriculture, culture and tourism in 2017-2023 was generally upward, in which the agriculture industry had the highest growth between 2022 and 2023, with an increase of 0.0445.After analyzing the factors influencing the development of the coupled agriculture, culture and tourism industries in the Yijun county region by applying the spatial Durbin model, it was found that the general budget expenditures, human capital, infrastructure construction, fixed asset investment and education investment in the region at a significant level of 0.01 correlation of 0.211, 0.03, 0.082 and 0.085, and education investment in the region at a significant level of 0.1 correlation of 0.211.These five factors significantly affect the Yijun County region agriculture, culture and tourism industry, and deepen the development of integration of tourism industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".