Deep Learning-Driven Digital Twin for Remote Control of Power Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At present, digital twin technology has been developed in many ields and plays a very important role.In this study, digital twin technology is applied to remote control of power system to build a set of remote control system of power system, which contains perception layer, data layer, operation layer, function layer and application layer.In order to make the power system remote control system more reliable and effective, a power system fault diagnosis method based on MRPSODE-ELM is proposed using deep learning technology.The method combines PSO algorithm and DE algorithm to construct a multiple stochastic variation particle swarm differential evolution algorithm, and it is used for the optimization seeking ability of the number of neurons in the hidden layer of the limit learning machine.The experimental results show that the MRPSODE-ELM model performs superiorly in detecting different fault types in terms of accuracy, recall and F1 score, with the results of each index above 95%, and the fault diagnosis accuracy is improved by 4.77% and 3.36% over SVM algorithm and DNN algorithm, respectively, and possesses a smaller training time consumption.The fault detection method proposed in the study can be applied to the remote control of power systems based on digital twins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".