MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793538 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-205

Research on the realization of food packaging design innovation and production efficiency improvement based on digital simulation technology

2025· article· en· W4409793538 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealization (probability)Production (economics)Manufacturing engineeringFood processingComputer scienceSystems engineeringEngineeringProcess engineeringFood scienceMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on digital simulation technology, this paper proposes a food packaging design model and a food production efficiency improvement model with food production as the research entry point.Establish the overall structure of the virtual reality design environment, the parameters of the packaging design process is converted into basic parameters to describe the problem, and the data is fed back to the CAD system to realize the design work.Design the hybrid optimization genetic algorithm based on annealing principle, adjust and optimize the production process and initialize the operation, simulate the annealing genetic algorithm process, and complete the production and processing scheduling sequence.Take A Food Co., Ltd. as the research object to carry out food packaging design and production efficiency improvement practice.The egg cake product packaging design scheme constructed by using the packaging design method in this paper obtains the total attention time of the subjects to be 149.3s,and the subjective score value reaches 85 points, which is better than the original packaging design.And in the real simulation of production using the production efficiency improvement method of this paper, the total production process operating time percentage is reduced from 73.8% to 35.1%, and the food production capacity is steadily increased by about 6%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207