Research on Optimizing Primary School Classroom Atmosphere Based on Emotional Analysis Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the field of artificial intelligence education, teaching emotion, as the main assessment basis for teaching evaluation, profoundly affects the teaching method, classroom atmosphere and teaching effect of teachers.This thesis proposes a combined network structure, CRNN, by taking advantage of CNN for speech emotion feature extraction and RNN for sequence modeling, and realizes emotion recognition of classroom discourse through DenseNet neural network to realize the crosstalk between each layer and other layers, and LSTM neural network to complete the task of speech emotion classification.On this basis, the open classroom video of the sixth grade of an elementary school is analyzed for sentiment, and the teaching practice of the application of speech emotion recognition model is carried out to study the optimization effect of the model application on the classroom atmosphere of the elementary school.The overall sentiment value of the classroom interaction video floats in the range of 0~1.9, showing a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, reflecting the feasibility of applying the speech emotion recognition model of this paper to classroom sentiment analysis.Through the teaching experiment, the positive emotional performance of the experimental group is more obvious than that of the control group, and 95.46% of the students agree that the application of the model can improve classroom interaction and the overall atmosphere.The speech emotion recognition model studied here can mobilize the classroom atmosphere, and has more important classroom guidance and application significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".