A quantitative assessment of the relationship between college management and college students’ employability enhancement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a close quantitative relationship between college management and college students' employability.This paper adopts Adaboost integration algorithm to construct an employment management system that integrates graduates' personalized recommendation.And it divides graduates according to their personal situation and analyzes the relationship between their personal ability and employment recommendation.In addition, the relationship between the management based on the system of this paper and the employment ability of graduates in colleges and universities is quantitatively analyzed by logistic regression model.A questionnaire survey is taken to assess the changes in graduates' employability as a result of the employment management activities organized by colleges and universities.The recommendation system constructed in this paper has a higher accuracy rate of 6.92% and 16.32% than the comparison system 1 and 2 respectively when the number of job recommendations is 60.And its recall rate and F1 value are also consistently higher than the comparison system.In this paper, the system divides the sampled 200 graduates into 5 categories to provide more accurate employment recommendation for graduates of different categories.The results of regression analysis show that universities organize employment management activities can improve the employability of graduates.For example, for every unit of "Interview practice", the employability of graduates increases by 0.349.The results of the questionnaire survey show that the employability of graduates, both individually and as a whole, improves to different degrees after participating in the management activities organized by colleges and universities.In conclusion, the construction of employment management system in universities and the organization of employment management activities can improve the quality and ability of graduates' employment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".