Computational study of adaptive current interruption protection strategy based on multi-intelligent body system in AC-DC hybrid power grid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aiming at the shortcomings of traditional relay protection, an adaptive multi-area protection coordination model is studied and designed.Firstly, combining different control strategies such as master-slave control and sag control, a method of AC/DC distribution network trend calculation and network loss analysis based on the alternating iteration method is proposed and realized to ensure that the adaptive relay protection can act correctly.The proposed method is analyzed for AC/DC hybrid distribution network trend calculation, and the alternating iteration solution method is used for trend analysis and calculation, and the effectiveness of the proposed method is veri ied by two examples of AC/DC hybrid distribution networks.Then the adaptive Agent with reinforcement learning is introduced, and its constructed multi-agent system has more system adaptive capability.The adaptive current interruption protection is compared with the traditional current interruption protection, and its protection principle and protection scope are analyzed, on the basis of which an adaptive coordinated protection method based on MAS grid is proposed to realize the MAS adaptive current interruption protection, and its simulation is veri ied.The experimental results show that the method of this paper can signi icantly improve the lexibility, effectiveness and stability of AC and DC distribution network operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".