MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793569 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-218

An innovative model program for teaching educational psychology based on the maximum information entropy model

2025· article· en· W4409793569 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyEntropy (arrow of time)Computer sciencePhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper carries out a research on the quantitative evaluation of classroom behavior based on the maximum information entropy model, explains the theory related to information entropy and analyzes the concept of information entropy.The improved iFIAS interactive analysis system was used as the main analysis tool, and S-T analysis and time series analysis were used as auxiliary analysis methods to analyze the classroom teaching behaviors.Classroom teaching behaviors were coded and sampled, from which classroom teaching behavior related data were obtained, through which teaching behavior information entropy, redundancy, interaction mode, teaching mode and behavior category frequency were analyzed.After analysis, the overall classroom teaching characteristics of the psychoeducational quality lesson examples are teacher behavior and student behavior as the main, psychoeducational and teaching materials as the secondary, and the teacher's behavior in the early part of the classroom accounts for a high proportion in order to drive the students into the classroom.The proportion of student behavior rises in the middle and late stages.The proportion of hybrid and dialogic teaching mode is 95.83%, which is dozens of times more than the proportion of lecture.It reveals the teaching mode of quality psychology classroom teachers, i.e., focusing on the interaction with students and replacing the pure teacher lecture student acceptance mode with interactive counseling student active learning.The teaching analysis of quality classroom teaching behaviors with the maximum information entropy model realizes the establishment of an innovative model of psychological teaching and clarifies the direction for the future development of psychoeducational classrooms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207