A Study on the Influence Path of Corporate ESG Disclosure Quality and Sustainability Performance Based on Bayesian Network Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corporate ESG disclosure quality is a key condition to optimize industrial structure and a realistic path to reach sustainability performance.Based on the theoretical knowledge of Bayesian network model, the research program of corporate ESG disclosure quality and sustainability performance in luence path is designed.According to the current status of enterprise development, 11 research variables are set, which contain explanatory variables, interpreted variables, and control variables.Mathematical statistics and Bayesian network modeling are adopted to parse the mutual in luence mechanism between the two.In the forward Bayesian inference, the probability of enterprise sustainability performance being in a good state is 49.3%, and the probability of the explanatory variables being in a good state is increased to 58.7% by changing the state probability of other variables.In order to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationship, backward Bayesian inference was also performed, and when the probability of sustainability performance being in a good state was 100%, the probability of the board concurrent position being in a good state was the highest with a value of 72.3%.This study enhances the most effective corporate ESG disclosure quality control program for companies to maximize the possibility of sustainability performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".