Study on the Innovation of Spatial Planning and Financial Resource Allocation Mechanism of the Intelligent Financial System of Public Hospitals in Refined Construction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the development of big data, cloud computing and 5G digital technology, smart finance has emerged.The use of modern information technology to create a smart financial management system to transform and upgrade the original financial management system of the hospital has become an indispensable part of the effective operation and management of public hospitals.The article focuses on the current problems in the development of smart finance in public hospitals, plans the smart finance space from the front, middle and back office, and proposes a financial resource allocation mechanism from the perspective of smart finance.In the performance evaluation analysis of smart financial construction, the weights of the professional level of accounting personnel, financial accounting, comprehensive budget management situation, medical revenue management, outpatient satisfaction, and the standardisation of data sets are 0.1067, 0.0857, 0.0670, 0.0630, 0.0512, and 0.0476 in that order.The weights of cultivating human resources, consolidating the hospital's financial foundation work, strengthening comprehensive budget management, promoting data standardisation and enhancing patient satisfaction are important ways to promote the development of smart financial construction in hospitals.The purpose of this paper is to provide reference and reference for the financial revenue management of public hospitals, to help hospitals optimise the management process, to improve the quality of service and to ensure financial security.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".