A Strategic Path for Chinese Enterprises to Achieve High-Quality Development within the ESG Framework Driven by Digital Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The digital era requires enterprises to pay attention to technological innovation and optimise ESG performance in the development process, so as to achieve high-quality development.Based on this, this paper proposes the hypotheses related to enterprise ESG, technological innovation and enterprise high-quality development.And construct the regression model of enterprise ESG performance and high-quality development.Basic statistics and correlation analysis are used to provide a preliminary description of enterprise ESG performance and high-quality development.Through the total effect test, the role of enterprise ESG performance on high-quality development is clarified.Through the mediation effect test, the role played by technological innovation between corporate ESG and highquality development is clarified, and the proposed hypotheses are verified, and the property rights, geographic and industry differences in the impact of corporate ESG performance on high-quality development are further explored by using robustness test and heterogeneity analysis.Finally, corresponding recommendations are made.Most of the enterprises selected in this paper have low levels of high-quality development, unsatisfactory ESG performance, and large overall gaps in technological innovation.The correlation coefficients of ESG performance (ESG) with corporate highquality development (LnTFP) and technological innovation are 0.402 and 0.335, respectively, and all of them are significantly and positively correlated at the 1 per cent level.Hypotheses H1, H2, and H3 are all valid.ESG performance and technological innovation have more significant effects on the highquality development of state-owned enterprises, eastern regions, and high-pollution enterprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".