MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793592 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-157

Design of Intelligent Management System for Underground Cable Tunnels and Integration of Robotic Inspection and Defect Recognition Technology

2025· article· en· W4409793592 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringComputer scienceSystems engineeringConstruction engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underground cable tunnels are important infrastructures to maintain the normal operation of cities, and problems such as cable insulation aging and discharge can easily cause fires or even explosions, so the requirements for maintenance are high.In this study, the DGPS positioning method is used to optimise the positioning system of the intelligent inspection robot for underground cable tunnels, and the LQR controller is used to realise the deviation correction of angle and position in the motion path of the intelligent inspection robot.Then the inspection robot and UHF sensor are used to detect and accurately locate the defects in the cable tunnel, and finally the deviation correction and defect detection methods are integrated to design an intelligent management system for underground cable tunnels.The results of simulation experiments and field surveys show that the proposed method can correct the deviation of the robot in the inspection process in a timely manner, avoiding the problems of hitting the obstacles and the path around the long distance, and the average time consumed in the simulation map scenario is only 6.89 s.The communication scheme of the intelligent management system is practicable, and it can effectively detect and identify the defects and the specific location of the defects in the underground cable tunnels.The system proposed in this paper is able to detect defects and faults in time in practical applications, providing a new solution for the inspection of underground cable tunnels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207