MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793607 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-206

Study on Automatic Monitoring of Electricity Consumption for Maintenance of Low-Voltage Intelligent Distribution Boxes in Power Systems

2025· article· en· W4409793607 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Southern Power Grid
KeywordsElectricityPower consumptionLow voltageElectric power distributionVoltageAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)Consumption (sociology)Electrical engineeringReliability engineeringProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the development process of China's power system, automatic monitoring mode has become an important development direction.In this context, how to achieve real-time monitoring of power data in the system has become an urgent problem.In this paper, considering the current range, the controller with input current is selected to collect voltage and current data signals and detect their circuits.Through metadata integration, the semantic integration of data expression is solved to achieve the management of electric power metadata.The collected data are sequentially accessed, handled and processed, the calibration of the voltage and current signals is agreed upon, the AD-converted values are read and the electrical parameters are calculated.Using the communication protocol IEC61850, the processed electric power data is uploaded into the server to complete the electric power data reading and monitoring tasks.The real-time management platform of intelligent maintenance power box constructed in this paper is used to monitor the abnormal power data.The abnormal power data appeared at different times, and the peak value of abnormal value 1 appeared at 14:00, and the peak data was 0.91 w.The evaluation value interval of the security threat in the transmission of power data is between 100-200 g, and the energy interval fluctuates around 1000 c.The results obtained are more reasonable, and the security of the data is guaranteed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207