Research on Resource Optimization Path of Agricultural Water-saving Irrigation Management Supported by Intelligent Algorithms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to improve the efficiency of agricultural irrigation industry and ensure the economy and environmental protection in the production process.The study proposes an agricultural water-saving irrigation path optimisation method based on the NGSA-III algorithm, and establishes a multiobjective water-saving optimal allocation model for the agricultural water source irrigation system.The NGSA-III algorithm is used to obtain the optimal solution of the model and achieve the path optimisation of agricultural water-saving irrigation resources.The results show that the running time of the article method to get the optimal path result is 0.31s, which can improve the economic and environmental benefits of the agricultural irrigation industry, the model in this paper can achieve the effect of smaller environmental objectives when the economic objectives are larger, and three solutions are selected to trade-off the analysis of economic and environmental objectives.Among the three different optimal solutions, the decision maker can choose the decision scheme according to the actual situation, which provides reference for agricultural water saving path planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it