MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793613 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-159

Research on Resource Optimization Path of Agricultural Water-saving Irrigation Management Supported by Intelligent Algorithms

2025· article· en· W4409793613 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPath (computing)AgricultureIrrigationResource (disambiguation)Computer scienceWater resourcesWater resource managementAgricultural engineeringAlgorithmOperations researchEnvironmental scienceEngineeringGeographyAgronomyEcologyComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to improve the efficiency of agricultural irrigation industry and ensure the economy and environmental protection in the production process.The study proposes an agricultural water-saving irrigation path optimisation method based on the NGSA-III algorithm, and establishes a multiobjective water-saving optimal allocation model for the agricultural water source irrigation system.The NGSA-III algorithm is used to obtain the optimal solution of the model and achieve the path optimisation of agricultural water-saving irrigation resources.The results show that the running time of the article method to get the optimal path result is 0.31s, which can improve the economic and environmental benefits of the agricultural irrigation industry, the model in this paper can achieve the effect of smaller environmental objectives when the economic objectives are larger, and three solutions are selected to trade-off the analysis of economic and environmental objectives.Among the three different optimal solutions, the decision maker can choose the decision scheme according to the actual situation, which provides reference for agricultural water saving path planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicRegional Development and EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207