MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793670 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-258

A Safety Detection Model for Substation Operations Based on Combination of Spatial Context Reasoning Algorithm and Deep Learning Techniques

2025· article· en· W4409793670 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmDeep learningMachine learningGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The environment near substations is complex, and electrocution accidents of operators occur from time to time during on-site operations, and the development of safety detection models for substation operations has received more and more attention.The article proposes a safety distance detection model for substation operation, which is mainly composed of binocular stereo matching perception model and safe area detection model.The binocular stereo matching perception is based on the PSMNet network model, combined with the parallax regression calculation to obtain the threedimensional coordinates of the operation area in the process of substation operation, and the threedimensional reconstruction of the substation operation process.The spatial context inference algorithm is utilized in the safe region detection model to detect the edge of the safe region, and the image segmentation of the safe region of the substation operation scene is performed by the improved OTSU algorithm.Then the three-dimensional coordinates obtained from binocular stereo matching perception and the three-dimensional coordinates of safe region detection are solved for the Euclidean distance, and then the safe distance detection of substation operation is realized.The EPE result accuracy of binocular stereo perception matching on the dataset is reduced by 0.71px compared with CRL, and the resulting mismatch pixel rate is between 0.83 and 1.48%.The average time-consuming image segmentation of the improved OTSU threshold segmentation method is 6.34ms, and the average relative error of the safety distance detection for substation operation is only 0.85%, and the maximum absolute error of the safety distance detection is only 0.13 m.Combining the spatial contextual reasoning algorithm with the deep learning technology can realize the effective detection of the safety distance for substation operation in multiple scenarios, and fully ensure the operation of the substation workers' safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicAdvanced Decision-Making TechniquesFrench-language works237,207