Optimal control during anaerobic digestion of highly concentrated organic wastewater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anaerobic biological treatment of wastewater is an important technology in environmental engineering and energy engineering, and it is one of the methods for powerful treatment of highly concentrated organic wastewater.The study was conducted to design an optimal control strategy based on the anaerobic digestion model ADM1.Taking the maximisation of total gas production as the control objective, the Composite Intelligent Optimised Extreme Value Control Algorithm (CIOEC) was designed by combining the extreme value search control method with the model-free optimisation algorithm.The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is verified by a combination of simulation tests and empirical analyses, and the CIOEC algorithm can maintain fast convergence and relative stability under both stable and changing input materials, and obtain the highest real-time gas production.Among them, the average daily gas production of the ADM1 system with the addition of the CIOEC algorithm can reach 873.9 mL, which is an increase of 124.3% compared with the original system.It shows that the algorithm proposed in this paper can enhance the total gas production and optimise the treatment effect in performing anaerobic digestion of high concentration organic wastewater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".