MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793676 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-169

Research on the promotion effect of supply chain finance innovation on regional economy based on blockchain technology

2025· article· en· W4409793676 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlockchainPromotion (chess)Supply chainBusinessIndustrial organizationMarketingComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supply chain finance innovation has a significant impact on regional economy.In this paper, blockchain technology is applied to supply chain finance business to improve the technology and security of traditional supply chain finance business.Drawing on relevant research results, we construct a blockchain-based supply chain financial innovation efficiency evaluation index system and measure the supply chain financial innovation efficiency using Malmquist index.A spatial econometric model is used to test the spillover effect and spatial synergy between supply chain financial innovation and regional economic growth, and to demonstrate the promotional effect of blockchain-based supply chain financial innovation on regional economic growth.The centres of the distribution curves of the kernel density function of the logarithmic value of GDP and supply chain financial innovation of the 30 provinces and regions are all shifted to the right, and the height of the main peak rises gradually.The 2013-2023 regional Moran's index of economic growth and supply chain financial innovation are both significantly positive.The regression coefficients of supply chain financial innovation under the two spatial weights are significant at the 1% level, which provides strong data support for the view that supply chain financial innovation can promote regional economic growth in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFrench-language works237,207