Research on Real-time Dynamic Adjustment Strategy of Industry-Teaching Integration Practical Training Process in Higher Vocational Education Based on Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The era of big data in education has come, data-driven intelligent decision-making has become the development trend in the era of big data, and precise teaching has become the keyword in the era of big data.This paper establishes a real-time dynamic teaching strategy adjustment decision-making model based on the learning characteristics in the process of industry-teaching integration practical training in higher vocational education, and uses Markov decision-making and Q-learning algorithms to solve the optimal teaching strategy in each stage of practical training and learning, which assists the teachers in decision-making and precise intervention.The results of the practical training teaching experiment found that the students in the experimental group, after the dynamic adjustment and intervention strategy implementation of the industry-teaching integration practical teaching, the scores of the practical training theory and application knowledge test were significantly improved (P<0.05), and the students' self-efficacy control sense, sense of effort, and sense of competence were all improved to different degrees.In addition, the scores of depth of understanding (P=0.000) and strategic approach (P=0.000) in practical training learning competencies also increased significantly.The strategy proposed in this study is able to capture the dynamic characteristics of educational data and use the multi-stage dynamic decision-making method to study the development of teaching strategies, which can provide stronger support for accurate teaching decisions and industry-teaching integration of practical training learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".