Research on the design and optimization of ecological landscape water body network based on linear programming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of the regional economy, the urbanization process is gradually accelerated, and the ecological safety problems of the urban water body network gradually appear, so this paper is based on linear planning to optimize the ecological landscape water body network.The study first gives a detailed description of the linear planning theory and highlights the gray linear planning model used.Based on the ecological constraints of the landscape pattern quantity optimization research, the "top-down" gray linear planning model from six aspects to build ecological constraints and objective function, through the simplex method to solve, resulting in different scenarios of the total amount of control of the optimization program.Three practicable optimization scenarios are obtained through repeated debugging of the optimization results, and the three scenarios achieve different results in terms of economic and ecological values.In this paper, effective optimization schemes are proposed for different optimization purposes, which on the one hand make the optimization results more realistically reflect the changes of the ecological landscape water body network, and on the other hand provide an optimal model for the management and development of the ecological landscape water body network, and promote the sustainable development of the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it