Optimization strategies for real-time target detection and tracking in complex scenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, some important algorithms in the field of target detection and tracking are optimized.Firstly, Gaussian modeling is performed in the color space for the dynamic background, and the priority is set for ranking.Then introduce adaptive Gaussian component number mixing, adaptively change the weights, and adaptively change the number of mixed Gaussian components according to the pixel color change in the scene to improve the convergence speed of the complex scene.Finally, Kalman filtering and mean drift algorithm are combined to ensure the robustness of target tracking in complex scenes.The single-frame detection time, accuracy, and average tracking error of the algorithm designed in this paper are examined on the dataset, and it is found that the time consumed by the algorithm in this paper in the three scenarios is 242ms, 323ms, and 274ms, respectively, with the highest accuracy of 96.9% and the average tracking error of only 1.5 pixels.The optimization algorithm designed in this paper is able to adapt to the slight disturbance of the background scene and overcome the influence of noise and ambient lighting, which is a target detection and tracking algorithm with good robustness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".