Infectious disease prevention strategies for social health: a reinforcement learning-based assessment of the effectiveness of social capital investments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disease prevention has always had an important impact on the development of human life and health.The integration of complex network theory and disease has become one of the major trends in epidemiologic research.However, aspects such as individual vaccination behavior and vaccination costs are affected by social capital investment.Based on this, the article investigates a reinforcement learning model of social capital investment on disease prevention.Based on the mechanism of infectious disease dynamics on complex networks, the article investigates the Markov decision process and composition of the reinforcement learning model, and utilizes the theory related to infectious disease dynamics and reinforcement learning to study the mechanism of voluntary vaccination based on epidemic perception.It was found that when the ratio of two kinds of investment (partial investment and full investment) reaches the set maximum value, the full investment policy of targeting selection is more effective in reducing the scale of disease infection in the whole social network and reducing the total social cost, followed by partial investment, and the full investment policy of random selection brings the smallest effect.However, the results may differ for different population investment ratios and partial investment ratios, and both the full investment policy and partial investment policy can effectively control disease prevention, which is conducive to the healthy and prosperous development of the whole society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".