Construction of a Soil and Water Loss Probability Model and Landslide Risk Prediction for Hybrid Pumped Storage Engineering Based on an Online Monitoring Database
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of building a new type of energy system, pumped storage projects have been widely adopted as a form of energy storage with the most mature technology and the most economical investment.In this paper, a hybrid pumped storage project online monitoring system based on multisensors is proposed, and an online monitoring database is designed and constructed.Based on the data in the online monitoring database, the soil erosion of the hybrid pumped storage project is calculated and analyzed by combining the CSLE model.Then the attention mechanism is combined with BiLSTM model to construct the landslide risk prediction model of hybrid pumped storage project.The soil erosion during the construction of the hybrid pumped storage project is mainly distributed on the construction land, garden land, grassland and cropland, among which the construction land has the largest area of soil erosion (132.19 km²), followed by the area of soil erosion of cropland (29.24 km²).The MAPE is between 0.002% and 0.005% when predicting landslide risk deformation of hybrid pumped storage project using CNN-BiLSTM-ATT model.And using the model in this paper can minimize the error of rainfall on the prediction of landslide risk deformation and realize the safe and stable construction and operation of hybrid pumped storage projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".