MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409794964 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-431

Construction and analysis of digital intelligent flexible wrist rehabilitation equipment

2025· article· en· W4409794964 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Technology and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationWristPhysical medicine and rehabilitationComputer scienceEngineeringMedicinePhysical therapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to promote the development of medical rehabilitation industry, the study deeply analyzes flexible wearable devices and utilizes joint moment estimation based on skeletal muscle model in order to calculate the joint moments of elbow and wrist joints, so as to carry out the design of flexible pneumatic wrist joint system.And a fuzzy-PI dual-mode control strategy is used in the position control of the flexible pneumatic wrist joint to construct an intelligent flexible rehabilitation device for the wrist joint.The wrist joint rehabilitation equipment is systematically tested to analyze its practical application effect.The response speed of the fuzzy-PI dual-mode control method is faster than that of the traditional PID control strategy, and it can effectively reduce the vibration noise.The accuracy of the hybrid recognition method in this paper is 97%, which is better than the single recognition model.The average time taken by the wrist rehabilitation device on the seven tasks of lifting, grasping, undertaking, pulling, pushing, probing down and probing up is between 2.06 and 2.67 seconds.The output moments of the wrist and elbow positions were 17.1 and 11.6 N.m respectively for the human body-worn wrist joint rehabilitation device with 50N driving force output, and the joint output moments decreased significantly, and the joint comfort of the human body was improved greatly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it