Construction and analysis of digital intelligent flexible wrist rehabilitation equipment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to promote the development of medical rehabilitation industry, the study deeply analyzes flexible wearable devices and utilizes joint moment estimation based on skeletal muscle model in order to calculate the joint moments of elbow and wrist joints, so as to carry out the design of flexible pneumatic wrist joint system.And a fuzzy-PI dual-mode control strategy is used in the position control of the flexible pneumatic wrist joint to construct an intelligent flexible rehabilitation device for the wrist joint.The wrist joint rehabilitation equipment is systematically tested to analyze its practical application effect.The response speed of the fuzzy-PI dual-mode control method is faster than that of the traditional PID control strategy, and it can effectively reduce the vibration noise.The accuracy of the hybrid recognition method in this paper is 97%, which is better than the single recognition model.The average time taken by the wrist rehabilitation device on the seven tasks of lifting, grasping, undertaking, pulling, pushing, probing down and probing up is between 2.06 and 2.67 seconds.The output moments of the wrist and elbow positions were 17.1 and 11.6 N.m respectively for the human body-worn wrist joint rehabilitation device with 50N driving force output, and the joint output moments decreased significantly, and the joint comfort of the human body was improved greatly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".