MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409794980 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-484

Design of low-latency communication network for power system automation based on 5G technology

2025· article· en· W4409794980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomationLatency (audio)Computer scienceLow latency (capital markets)TelecommunicationsEmbedded systemComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the construction and development of new power system, grid business presents high reliability, high security protection, high flexibility, massive access level characteristics, 5G as the frontier technology of wireless network access, with high speed, wide connectivity, low latency features and advantages, and diversified grid business communication needs are highly compatible.Based on the characteristics of 5G communication technology, this paper analyzes its practicality in the power system.The main two protocols of the current autonomous network routing protocol for power system are proposed, and the inter-cluster routing optimization of OLSR is carried out by using AO algorithm.Simulate the predation behavior of skyhawk, develop the search strategy in the optimization process of AO algorithm, and construct the mathematical model of AO optimization algorithm.A quasi-inverse solution is used on the basis of the inverse solution to further increase the population diversity and convergence speed of the AO algorithm, while an adaptive weight factor strategy is used to balance the global search and local exploration capabilities of the AO algorithm.Simulation experiments are utilized to investigate the performance of the IAO algorithm as well as the PDR and delay in the mobile scenario of the power system.Comparing the PDR of the three protocols at different expected delivery distances, IOLSR still maintains a delivery rate of about 28% at a distance of 350m-500m.The optimized IOLSR shows further reduction in delay compared to OLSR in most of the cases with an average delay of 10829.43ns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it