Research on Enhancing the Efficiency of Creativity and Process Integration in Customized Garment Design through Meta-Learning Empowered by Artificial Intelligence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intelligent transformation of the apparel design industry needs to simultaneously meet the requirements of both efficiency improvement and personalization promotion.This paper proposes an intelligent design framework that integrates curve theory, garment prototyping and meta-learning technology.It optimizes the design of apparel by using the smoothness constraints of interpolation curves, the flexibility expression of parametric curves, and the local optimization characteristics of Bspline curves.Combine the prototype-based thinking model with meta-learning method to solve the generalization problem under small sample data and improve the model adaptation speed.The practical efficiency enhancement level and application value of the methods in this paper are verified through practice and testing, etc.The results show that the parametric design can realize the fast garment styling change of single parameter and multi-parameter.The optimization algorithm combining prototyping and meta-learning always takes less than 20 seconds in the 10-parameter range adjustment experiments, which is faster than the comparison algorithm.In the comprehensive fuzzy evaluation of experts and consumers, "very satisfied" and "good" account for 63.99% and 58.42%, respectively.The method based on technology fusion in this paper can significantly improve the design efficiency and user satisfaction of clothing personalization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".