Design of a multi-objective optimization model of blended teaching for the improvement of music teachers’ teaching ability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teaching optimization algorithm is a new type of group intelligence algorithm, which simulates the teaching process of teachers, and this paper improves the algorithm to realize the improvement of music teachers' teaching ability.Aiming at the shortcomings of the teaching optimization algorithm which is easy to mature prematurely, has low solution accuracy and converges to the local optimum, this paper proposes a teaching optimization algorithm which integrates the improved Tennessee whisker search.The algorithm combines Tent mapping and inverse learning strategy to initialize the population and improve the quality of the initial population.Tennessee whisker search is performed on teachers to improve their teaching ability.Incorporating the hybrid variation operator into the individual student variation formula allows the algorithm to quickly jump out of the local optimum dilemma.The experimental results show that the hybrid teaching optimization algorithm based on BASTLBO proposed in this paper has good solution accuracy and robustness in finding the optimum on different types of optimization problems.The algorithm in this paper can achieve better teaching ability results than the unimproved TLBO algorithm and the teaching optimization algorithm incorporating the hippocampus strategy, and the objective function on two different indexes is reduced by 8.75% and 7% compared with that of the TLBO algorithm, respectively, and the hybrid teaching multi-objective optimization model designed in this paper has stronger practicality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".